14

Space: 1999 Is The World We Should Be Living Now In Futures Past

This week my obsession with the way we used to see the future takes me to Earth’s moon, hurtling out of orbit in Space: 1999. Blast off with the latest installment in GFR’s ongoing series, Futures Past, right now.

Six years after Apollo 11′s historic 1969 landing on the moon it seemed as though man was taking the first step to something bigger and grander. By comparison to some of the other science fiction being produced in the time period, Gerry Anderson’s (Thunderbirds, UFO) British produced television series Space: 1999 actually took a fairly conservative approach to what man might accomplish in the depths of space. Yet even Gerry’s view, realistic though it strove to be, turned out to be far too optimistic.

Still, in 1975 it seemed entirely plausible that man would have a permanent base on the lunar surface within the next 25 years. So Anderson set out to make a show based in what, at least then, seemed like an inevitable future.

Here’s Martin Landau in the very first episode of Space: 1999, which was believe it or not, at the time the most expensive television program ever made. Watch it and I’ll see you afterward to discuss how they did at predicting the future…

The truth is that, aside from all the sleeve zippers, this is the world we should be living in right now. Establishing a base on the lunar surface, maybe even a base just like Moonbase Alpha, would have been completely plausible by 1999 had NASA continued to receive the kind of funding it deserved. Instead, after Apollo 11 America’s interest in exploring the cosmos waned and so did our government’s willingness to spend money on it.

Part of the problem, as it turns out, is that there just isn’t any profit in it. The moon’s a barren wilderness and we’ve yet to find anything worth going through all the trouble to go up there and get. Space: 1999 tries to clear this obstacle by presenting the moon as a reasonable solution to the world’s waste storage problem. That might have made sense if the cost of launching material into space had ever reached manageable levels. Unfortunately since money was never spent to develop a cheaper way of getting to the moon the cost to launch anything, let alone waste, remains prohibitively high.

Space: 1999 stayed on the air for two seasons and 48 episodes. At the time critics praised it, though as you’d expect scientists and science fiction authors alike were a little less than enthused with the whole “launching the moon out of orbit with a nuclear reaction” premise. Even then, that didn’t make a lot of sense. Yet so much of the rest of the show feels well thought out, right down to the G-forces when the moon’s blasted out of orbit, it’s easy to forgive them that one big piece of ridiculousness.

In an era where most science fiction predicted a future that was largely a wild fantasy, like the stuff of Battlestar Galactica or Buck Rodgers, Anderson’s series deserves praise for almost getting it right. Actually, I submit that he did get it right. Space: 1999 is the world we should be living in, we’re the ones who got it wrong.

Space 1999

Comments

  • cst

    At the time, Isaac  Asimov described it as being both the MOST scientifically accurate AND the LEAST scientifically accurate sci-fi show ever done.
     Incidentally, it’s an unofficial spin-off of the earlier show UFO. That program (set in the then-future 1980′s) also featured a Moonbase; it was slated to be revamped for a second series called UFO:1999. When plans fell through, the extensive design work reused for SPACE 1999 (and, in fact, although there’s no DIRECT continuity, it might be a direct sequel).

    • JT

      It really is strange that they strove so hard to be accurate in so many areas, and then just went totally off the rails with some of the bigger plot points… like the rocket moon. 

      • cst

        Well, apparently the  original concept involved the EARTH exploding, but studio heads didn’t like that.
         UFO’s approach to space travel was MUCH more realistic; there was no faster-than-light travel out of the solar system (the aliens came from a “10th Planet” orbiting on the other side of the sun). The earth defense force remained strictly within range of the Earth and Moon and never travelled to the alien world; the aliens needed to breath “liquid oxygen” (as used by real-world deep sea divers) to survive the pressures of long-distance travel.(although otherwise totally human-looking, the liquid would leave their skins stained green, making them resemble the alien cliche).
         Indeed, it is possibly that the aliens were from the planet featurd in the Anderson’s earlier feature film JOURNEY TO THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN; if so, it forms an interesting timeline:first contact leads to a “secret war”, which facilitates the creation of Moonbase Alpha.

  • http://www.facebook.com/briancmckinley Brian C McKinley

    I will be that guy.. Battlestar Galactica was the past :)  But I see what you are saying.  No money in simply moving to space for the sake of moving to space so it did not take off. I have been frustrated with this for all my life. I have come to the conclusion that the path we are taking is to produce all the cool technology that will inhabit our spaceships and moon/Mars bases in the future. Had we gone into space and remained there after the 60′s the technology would have evolved from 60′s NASA stuff and probably been clunky and not very “futuristic” kind of Old BSG. Now we have 60 years of frustrated Sci-Fi fans inventing everything they loved in their tv shows of childhood. In essence, when we do go into space to stay, it will probably look a lot more like TNG than BSG.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lee-Mc-Donald/1205872108 Lee Mc Donald

      I’m sorry, but you don’t make sense.  The technology HAS evolved from 60′s to now irregardless of NASA and space exploration. Remember, from concept, through design, to production takes from 5 to 10 years, depending on the complexity of what is being created. The space shuttle was approved in 1972, but construction didn’t begin till 1975, and it didn’t fly till 1981(which means it was top of the line 1970 technology). Yes, by the end it did have the beginnings of the “glass cockpit”, but only because it was constantly being updated. The reusable shuttle idea actually goes back to a 1957 project called “Dyna-Soar”(which congress canceled right as the prototype went to construction). Maybe the shuttle could have made its first flight 10 yeasr earlier if NASA/USAF had finished Dyna-Soar. So your “clunky” future technology is the same today as it was back then, just better bling. Which is all updating is.

  • http://mindtaker.blogspot.com/ drunken_economist

    If you want to blame a generation for ‘getting it wrong’ then place the blame squarely on the fat, distended laps of the Baby Boomers in the United States. Because while their parents were making ARPANet (the proto-Internet), and having these ambitious dreams of going into space (SSTO, the Space Shuttle, Cosmos) they were getting out of the Vietnam War.

    Flash forward to now. The same elitist generation that got 5 deferments and/or burned their draft cards (while a few of them went)– now run all the wars & bases in an Empire that covers the world. One of them has even observed this and used the script in a highly successful franchise, and has sold the story back to the slaves that pay up to 45% of their earnings to keep up the charade.

    We have the Boomer Elites to thank for Wars. Even before 9/11. Then there’s the $3 Trillion in Iraq War debt (that we know about, shadow stats say much more), the other Wars in the Middle East, propping up various regimes (Israel being the most offensive), oh, and lets not forget the Wars on Abstraction (“Drugs” “Terror”) that can never be “won.” Not to mention the DHS, the TSA, SOPA, ACTA, PIPA, OPEN and other things that make the USA look more like Eastern Germany every day.

    Those druggies from the “Summer of Love” woke up after their 25 year spending/partying, and like any druggy on a crash they’re having their nightmare phase. The dreams of our grandparents? Gone. We got it and continue to live it, very wrong indeed.

    • Anonymous

      Wow…at what point did alcohol make you totally and permanently lose touch with reality?

    • http://twitter.com/Dome_sfsn The Dome

      Seriously flawed logic and unsurprisingly so.

    • http://mindtaker.blogspot.com/ drunken_economist

      Seriously touched nerves by the most greedy, self centered generation to inhabit this ball named ‘dirt’ and unsurprisingly so.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Al-Pa/100001996399447 Al Pa

    yea but see your neglecting a few things, mostly its this… people always fight, the problem is when they fight with weapons instead of logic of argument, and in some cases passion can swing either way either for a deeper truth or the refusel to not give up thier point, fortanately seeking a logical conclusio even if it requries 30 years of thought is generaly more productive in the long run if not immedialtly.. unless action is required or seems to be lol

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lee-Mc-Donald/1205872108 Lee Mc Donald

    you got most of it right.

  • Anonymous

    So. Because YOU say the money should have been spent on a useless base that means it should have?

    • JT

      So.  Because YOU say a moon base would be useless, that means it is?

      See what I did there?

  • http://profiles.google.com/roninkai Mark J Reed

    If you could put toxic waste on the moon you could launch it in to the sun.

    Cute show, but the concept was not well thought out.