Read H.R. Giger’s Angry Letter To 20th Century Fox About An Alien: Resurrection Snub
This article is more than 2 years old
There are a lot of reasons to dislike Alien: Resurrection. There’s the pointless and convoluted resurrection Ripley after her sacrificial death at the end of Alien 3. There’s the godawful albino xenomorph at the end. And then there’s the inexplicable decision to not credit Swiss artist H.R. Giger in the film, in spite of his being responsible for the look of what has become one of the most iconic creatures ever seen in film. Back when the fourth Alien film was about to flop its way into theaters, Giger learned about 20th Century Fox’s preposterous decision not to include him in the film’s credits. Understandably, the guy was a little cheesed off.
And so Giger sat down and wrote the knuckleheads at Fox the following letter, shared via Letters of Note, which is a lot more polite than mine would have been.
November 13, 1997
To: TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX
The Alien Quartet has, from the very beginning, contained my unique and personal style. For the first film ALIEN, I was awarded an Oscar for “Best Achievement for Visual Effects”. In ALIENS, a film I was not asked to work on, I still received a screen credit for “Original Alien Design”. On ALIEN 3, I was cheated out of the Oscar nomination received by that film because 20th Century Fox gave me the credit, “Original Alien Design” again, instead of “Alien 3 Creature Design”, as it was my rightful title in accordance to my contract and the work I had performed on the film. In 1976 I had completed two paintings, “Necronom IV” and “Necronom V”, in which two long-headed creatures appeared. In 1977 these paintings were published in my book, NECRONOMICON, by Sphinx Verlag, Basel, in German. It was in this version of the book that Ridley Scott, in his search for a credible Alien creature, came across these two paintings and decided on them for the full-grown Alien, using the words “That’s it!” The statement has been graciously repeated by Ridley Scott in almost every interview about his work on ALIEN.
The creatures in ALIEN: RESURRECTION are even closer to my original Alien designs than the ones which appear in ALIENS and ALIEN 3. The film also resurrects my original designs for the other stages of the creature’s life-cycle, the Eggs, the Facehugger and the Chestburster. ALIEN: RESURRECTION is an excellent film. What would it look like without my Alien life-forms? In all likelihood, all the sequels to ALIEN would not even exist! The designs and my credit have been stolen from me, since I alone have designed the Alien. So why does Fox not give me the credit I rightfully earned?
As for those responsible for this conspiracy: All I can wish them is an Alien breeding inside their chests, which might just remind them that the “Alien Father” is H.R.Giger. H.R.Giger
Who knows why Fox decided not to give Giger his proper due in the Alien: Resurrection credits. Given how bad the movie was, they may have done him a favor. But trying to deny or downplay how integral Giger’s brilliant design work is to the Alien franchise is ludicrous and downright disrespectful. Can you even imagine the Alien movies without Giger’s designs for the titular critters? People have been trying ever since the first Alien film in 1979, usually with mediocre results at best. That’s an achievement that deserves to be recognized anytime some new filmmaker goes back into the Alien universe. Otherwise you might just find yourself locked in a room with an amourous facehugger…
