7

James Cameron Advised Schwarzenegger On Whether To Do Terminator 5

When Terminator Salvation  was released in 2009, Halcyon’s plan was to make several films continuing and exploring the decades-old franchise.  Unfortunately, the little matter of Halcyon’s bankruptcy got in the way of that plan.  Then Pacifor picked it up at a bankruptcy auction in 2010 and Deadline reported a year ago that none other than the original Terminator Arnold Schwarzenegger was attached to a fifth installment in the series.  Schwarzenegger’s move makes sense in the context of his post-gubernatorial return to action flicks, but it also seems that he had some “advising” from another significant figure from the franchise’s past: James Cameron.

In a recent interview with MTV News, Cameron revealed that he had been “quietly advising” Schwarzenegger on the potential new Terminator film.  Specifically, Cameron and the Governator spoke about what the film should look like if Schwarzenegger was to participate:

“I was trying to be as encouraging as possible. Frankly, at that time, I thought it needed to be more about him,” Cameron said. “I told him he should not do it until it’s focused on his character or he shouldn’t do it. I think there are some great stories that can be told about that character that haven’t even been thought of yet.”


On first blush, Cameron’s “advice” to Cameron reeks of egoism – Schwarzenegger shouldn’t participate unless the film is all about his character.  Might Cameron be right about the potential stories connected to the Schwarzenegger-model cyborg, though?  It is likely to be a while until we know what exactly Terminator 5 will shape up to be, seeing as it currently has no director or studio attached.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000995651932 Alex J Avriette

    Cameron’s “advice” to Cameron reeks of egoism – Yeah, it sure does!

  • Lifetime SF Fan

    Definitely ego — that said, I would trust this pair to turn in a good product. I would be sorry to not see the story arc continue, though, the closed timeloop is moving through it’s final stages now and it’s time for the resistance to find the Time Displacement systeem and send Kyle Reece back to 1984 so it can all start again…

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DAQ2P4X7YFUJYFQUJNZU4IRGGQ Mwani

    Cameron 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Siragusa/100000469627752 John Siragusa

    Maybe they will pull off a good one at the end of the day.

  • Terminator fan

    I’ve got to say this is the right move for Schwarzenegger – he can’t play the same role he’s played in the first three films.  He pulled off the T-800 for a remarkable amount of time – but he’s past the age for that.  The T-800 was absolutely integral to the success and appeal of the first two films and I think the origin of the model (and perhaps the man it was modeled after) might be an interesting film… as long as they don’t use it as a one-off joke like the third film almost did (which you can see in the deleted scenes).

  • http://www.facebook.com/DrewsPlace Andrew Reese

    Doesn’t matter. He’s too old now. 

  • Jamie Helton

    For Arnold to play a Terminator in his 60′s, the filmmakers would have to use a de-aging software to make him look younger, or go total motion capture.  I really don’t see how a story surrounding another T-800 would be relevant.  It was a mistake for “Terminator 3″ to do yet another story of a bad robot coming back in time to kill John Connor and a good robot returning to protect him.  The only thing that movie did to advance the storyline was actually show Skynet start the war. “Salvation” actually brought the series to the Future War, where any future movies need to stay.  For more thoughts on the “Terminator” series, check out this article:  http://filmverse.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/notes-from-the-future-war-the-terminator-series/