12

Five(ish) Sci-Fi Movies Roger Ebert Championed More Than He Should Have

fb share tweet share

prometheusPrometheus — (4 stars)
I won’t sit here and say that Ridley Scott’s massive return to sci-fi, 2012’s Prometheus, was a failure or anything, as it was perhaps one of the most gorgeous and conversation-friendly movies of the past decade. But Ebert gave it the highest rating possible, which is a move almost as questionable as everything the characters do in Prometheus. Ebert says that it “develops horror scenes comparable to Alien” and calls Michael Fassbender’s android David “sort of a walking, talking, utterly fearless HAL 9000,” while championing all the answerless questioning that the narrative provokes. But never does he call this gang of supposedly genius misfits out for handling this mission with all the skill and precision of a game of Operation played on a roller coaster. And I’m not convinced that Noomi Rapace “continues here the tradition of awesome feminine strength begun by Sigourney Weaver in Alien.” At least he gave Alien four stars as well, though I don’t think anyone in their right mind would critically put these films on the same shelf.

Key Quote: “I’m a pushover for material like this; it’s a seamless blend of story, special effects and pitch-perfect casting, filmed in sane, effective 3-D that doesn’t distract.”

Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

Comments

  1. King Gerbil says:

    Gotta say, I am with him on Knowing. It was a fantastic movie, Nic Cage aside. Some of the scenes were incredibly intense.

    • JT says:

      With you on that. Loved Knowing. Actually I think I gave it a really positive review for GFR: http://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/scifi/movie-review-knowing.html

      Obviously Nick disagrees and I think he’s probably in the majority on it. Most people seemed to hate it at the time.

      • renegadesix says:

        So when did you sell out to Microhaft? I get called this “No your mad…cry baby, your funny sony pony dickrider.” and no ban. I say something about Microshaft, ban hammer. That you would ban me and that Microshaft talking point spamming COIP shows just what a friggin’ hypocritical sell out you are.

        Thanks for ruining the last place that wasn’t sucking Microshaft dick.

        Go ahead and ban me here too, you hypocritical sell out.

        • coip says:

          You feel that sting?

          That’s pride.

          I win.

          • renegadesix says:

            QUOTED TO PREVENT NINJA EDITING

            coip renegadesix 8 hours ago
            That surely must sting a little.

            Poor guy. No more spreading your hate on Cinema Blend? That’s too bad. I’m sure no one will miss you, but you were warned. Nothing personal.

            I win

            ————————

            Stalking me? Now who is doing the harrasing? I see why you keep your profiles private now that I know that you are one of my “followers.” Sort of an appropriate title for you – follower.

    • Matthew Buczynski says:

      Absolutely agree with you on Knowing. I have never understood how people can judge a movie to be crap or great just by who is in a title role.

      Never understood why people are so against Nick Cage either to be honest.

  2. baros62 says:

    KNOWING is an excellent film. Nick always gets shit on so, therefore, his movies are crappy. I think not. I also think THE HAPPENING
    is a frightening situation film that could seriously happen in one way or another. The only beef I have is that it never explains why.
    POMPEII was visually stunning and historically correct. This 2013 version is the best one of all films made about that tragedy.

  3. Jim_A says:

    :O Roger gave HOW MANY stars to The Crappening !??

  4. TronSheridan says:

    I liked all of those movies except The Happening. That movie was absolute rubbish.
    Also, was six pages really necessary?

  5. Jays_Law says:

    Prometheus is a classic. A messy one, but a classic nonetheless. Sometimes, a film transcends its problems and for me, Prometheus does it. By the way, I actually like Shaw more in her debut than Ripley. I like Alien and all, but it’s not as if characterization was its strong suit. I remember Alien for its amazing directorial choices by Ridley Scott and while Ripley being the one that survives was certainly groundbreaking from a feminist perspective, she wasn’t exactly a fleshed out character. People remember Ripley more because of Aliens rather than Alien.

    So yea, Shaw has the more impressive debut. Of course, even with Aliens, I still like Shaw more than Ripley but that’s just personal preference rather than anything to do with the writing.

  6. Gary says:

    “In honor of arguably the last great movie critic, we decided to take a look back at five of his more egregious sci-fi reviews” …and totally crap on his face.

    Unnecessary article.

    • magusxxx says:

      I agree. This was the man who gave Treasure Planet a thumbs up only because “it’s the only kids movies being released right now.” Funny how only Disney released material ever got this kind of consideration.